Report
Incarcerating Democracy
Highlighting voter suppression in the 2020 election

Key Observations

  • Descendants of the slave trade, first nations people, women, the economically disadvantaged,and those disenfranchised due to criminal convictions have never had the same access to voting as men of European descent.
  • At least four states disenfranchise all prisoners and parolees, 16 states limit the vote of those in prison, on parole, or on probation, and 11 states disenfranchise individual’s post-incarceration.
  • The first step to addressing voting suppression is advocating for the rights of convicted felons.
Download

Incarcerating Democracy

Incarcerating Democracy

Descendants of the slave trade, first nations people, women, the economically disadvantaged, and those disenfranchised due to criminal convictions have never had the same access to power as men of European descent. For the greater part of U.S. history, laws have prohibited many groups from the right of a representative government. Decades of social justice advocacy, and civil rights movements have overturned laws that promoted outright exclusion. However, powerful policymakers and power brokers have continued to invoke strategic barriers to the ballot by prohibiting traditionally disenfranchised communities from influencing political outcomes.This brief is a look at the ongoing and emerging approaches for limiting representative government as well as the crime of voter suppression itself, which ultimately curtails the possibilities of democracy. In this report, we highlight the current tactics used to implement voter suppression and discuss the strategic measures to combat disenfranchisement tactics.

Download
Download
Incarcerating Democracy
Incarcerating Democracy